next up previous
Next: The Concept of Item Up: The g-factor in Intelligence Previous: Factor Analysis of Golf

The Concept of Test Equivalence

The finding of a single factor in a correlation matrix can nevertheless be very meaningfull, provided that it is not immediately reified into a specific unitary faculty. It means that, whatever factors play a role in the emergence of the test scores, they play a role in the same way for all tests. In that respect it is much more appropriate to use the concept of test equivalence instead of the concept of unidimensionality. The concept of unidimensionality may easily suggest that a single, unitary faculty is measured by the various tests. The concept of test equivalence does not have this connation. A formal definition of test equivalence has been given by by Lord & Novick (1968, p. 49-50). They distinguish the concepts of tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence and essentially tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence. The definition of tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence is given on page 49 and reads as follows:

Distinct measures tex2html_wrap_inline977 and tex2html_wrap_inline979 of person i on measurement j and k are tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalent if, for all i, tex2html_wrap_inline991 (Lord & Novick (1968, p. 49, definition 2.13.5).

tex2html_wrap_inline977 is the observed score of person i on measurement j and tex2html_wrap_inline999 is the true score of person i on measurement j.

The true score tex2html_wrap_inline999 of person i on measurement j is defined as the expected value of of the observed score, that is tex2html_wrap_inline1011 (Lord & Novick (1968, p. 30, definition 2.3.1).

The definition of essentially tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence is given on page 50 and reads as follows:

Distinct measures tex2html_wrap_inline977 and tex2html_wrap_inline979 of person i on measurement j and k are essentially tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalent if, for all i, tex2html_wrap_inline1029 , where tex2html_wrap_inline1031 is a constant (Lord & Novick (1968, p. 50, definition 2.13.8).

Note, that neither in the case of tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence, nor in the case of essentially tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence tex2html_wrap_inline1037 , that is, the error variances are not necessarily equal. Both tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence and essentially tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence are special cases of linearly tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence, where linearly tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence is defined as follows:

Distinct measures tex2html_wrap_inline977 and tex2html_wrap_inline979 of person i on measurement j and k are linearly tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalent if, for all i, tex2html_wrap_inline1061 , where tex2html_wrap_inline1031 and tex2html_wrap_inline1065 both are constants.

For tex2html_wrap_inline1067 and tex2html_wrap_inline1069 , one obtains tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence and for tex2html_wrap_inline1069 , one obtains essentially tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence. If the additional assumption is made that tex2html_wrap_inline1077 , then linearly tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence is equivalent with the unidimenional factor analytical model. Therefore it is legitimate to use factor analysis to the test the null-hypothesis of linearly tex2html_wrap_inline971 -equivalence. Note, that the factor loadings reflect the error variances tex2html_wrap_inline1083 .


next up previous
Next: The Concept of Item Up: The g-factor in Intelligence Previous: Factor Analysis of Golf

AHGS van der Ven