next up previous
Next: Elaboration 70 Up: Elaborations Previous: Elaboration 68


Elaboration 69

It seems well to give a handy argument here for the topic of legality/illegality. So many people I meet do not seem able to grasp the foundations of it, (the rights and duties of man). First of all, nay first of every system of thinking, is that we all share the same reality. In this reality, we all share the same planet. From this, it is easy to see that all citizens have equal rights and equal duties with regard to everything on that planet. Because all governments NOT on a mondial scale, have to make decisions with regard to only part of the globe, and only part of the population, while they all concern everybody (5 billion, better 5 million), these decisions are made by an illegal body. This illegality is easily shown by pointing to the laws that are illegal too, (of necessity). The same act can be against a law in one place, or with regard to one 'nationality', while the rights and duties of 'all' citizens are equal and this means that all acts, on all places, and by all persons should be judged by the same laws. Take the fact that 'ideas' fall under strict law. Money, after all is only an idea. When in country A they use the Obol as unit, it is clear that the law cannot decide over the Shekels of a neighbouring country B. With regard to counterfeit, it might be thought that an agreement is useful, saying that, when you punish falsification of our money, we would do so for your money. But how about a citizen of A putting his money into the shekels of B and has interest, on a B bank-account added to it (saving for a rainy day) ? The law in A might stipulate that you pay tax upon the interest, but certainly not on interest in shekels! In the same manner, the language of a neighbouring country is not the lawfully official one of the country, so, one can slander and insult as long as it is in the other language. The so called sovereign governments have acquired their sham-legality by, either a superstition, a god who has 'chosen' the king, by stupid tradition, or, even worse, by the majority rule of a group of earth citizens, a majority of mental cripples a-riot, as Wells put it. In order to be legal at all, 'a' governing or ruling body 'must' have the backing, the consent of all persons that are affected by this ruling, these decisions. This determines not only what are the limits of ruling in local governing, but also exactly where all jurisdiction stops. This is different from our own daily experience. We often encounter absolute authorities that are even apt to rule over life and death. No wonder our children cannot think fundamentally (logically), when they start life, and grow up in a totally crazy society.
next up previous
Next: Elaboration 70 Up: Elaborations Previous: Elaboration 68
Ven 2007-09-11