Elaboration 9

The United Nations is not an organ that controls. It is a debating club (as Voigt says) because it lacks precisely that what the late League of Nations was lacking, the controlling capacity. Schwarzschild shows this as the only particular that it should have had, but was lacking and therefore caused World War 2. When one wants to control something and one has not the power to do it (effective sanctions), one might as well go home and grow beans, not, as the diplomats did in the League, and are still doing in the U.N., talk and talk and sign resolutions. Schwarzschild is a must for those stupidologists who want to know about the ultimates of stupid diplomatic bungling. The U. N. certainly does not resemble a world government, nor is it a forerunner of it. When you say unite, paradoxically, you mean divide. Only when you say integrate you mean anti-, or nonnationalism, i.e. the total absence of diplomats. A world without nations does not know diplomats, nor foreign policy, war, treaties, conventions, and other papers of armistice, of armed peace. When one says 'you are a Jew' he is racist, when one says 'I am a Jew' he too is a racist. Both are first steps to gas-chambers, to torture, experiments on this lower race, contempt for human dignity. The one who says: 'You are a Jew (American, Catholic, Hindu, Corsican, etc.) is discriminating, disdaining, some millions of others, the one who says: 'I am a Jew (American, etc.) ', holds billions of others in contempt.