next up previous
Next: Elaboration 13 Up: Elaborations Previous: Elaboration 11


Elaboration 12

Of this, so ample a literature is available that the absence of knowledge about it is stunning. Not only has chemo-anaesthesis been obsolete 25 years BEFORE its invention (1821-1845) though still in use everywhere, the writ- ings of Coué, Baudouin, Tietjens, Brooks, Satow, etc. have been confirmed and improved upon ever since. With regard to the rights and duties of doctors and patients, the 'not' helping of people that come for help, by ignoring the techniques and science necessary to do so, ... there is a term for this, that is; crime. After all, doctors are paid tremendous salaries for their bungling, they could easily do good work on 1920 level. If a doctor just did what Coué did, he would be 65 years out of date, but he also would have 40,000 satisfied clients per year. There is proof a-plenty, even in 'The Lancet, the Brit. Med. Journ., etc. ' that e.g. asthma is easily dealt with (i.e. cured!) by words (not poisons) in one or two sittings. But for this, one has to study hypnodynamics, the knowledge of ideation in trances. Right now, there are absurd and horrible discussions at work about euthanasia, the killing of a person on his request. What is the truth (unknown to judicature, pseudology and medicine alike) about it? The patient may indeed request to stop his life, when it has become unbearable in its suffering, but ... he is under the FALSE impression that there is nothing else to do against this. Should he know that it is wholly possible to be painless, without being pumped full of poisons, but by mere talk, he certainly would not ask to be killed, but HELPED from this pain. Physicists know nothing of pain, as long as they do not realize that physical objects never suffer it. Like all other life-typical subjects, pain too is ideational. Since it is that, the obvious way to handle it is ideation, the control of physics. Talk-anaesthesia is hundreds of years old. A crack as e.g. Erickson showed it for terminal cancer patients. They could sit up in bed without pain, as humans instead of insensitive bags of protoplasm. Any discussion about euthanasia, MUST begin with the known facts of life, so that the patients ask for adequate help, instead of death by a help-ignorant physicist. Euthanasia, then, becomes a meaningless term, no subject for discussion. Judges should know this in order to force the doctors to study AND practise what has been in the books for hundreds of years. These are the rights and duties of man!
next up previous
Next: Elaboration 13 Up: Elaborations Previous: Elaboration 11
Ven 2007-09-11