Next: Elaboration 13
Up: Elaborations
Previous: Elaboration 11
Elaboration 12
Of this, so ample a literature is available that the absence of
knowledge about it is stunning. Not only has chemo-anaesthesis been
obsolete 25 years BEFORE its invention (1821-1845) though still in
use everywhere, the writ- ings of Coué, Baudouin, Tietjens,
Brooks, Satow, etc. have been confirmed and improved upon ever
since. With regard to the rights and duties of doctors and patients,
the 'not' helping of people that come for help, by ignoring the
techniques and science necessary to do so, ... there is a term for
this, that is; crime. After all, doctors are paid tremendous
salaries for their bungling, they could easily do good work on 1920
level. If a doctor just did what Coué did, he would be 65 years
out of date, but he also would have 40,000 satisfied clients per
year. There is proof a-plenty, even in 'The Lancet, the Brit. Med.
Journ., etc. ' that e.g. asthma is easily dealt with (i.e. cured!)
by words (not poisons) in one or two sittings. But for this, one has
to study hypnodynamics, the knowledge of ideation in trances. Right
now, there are absurd and horrible discussions at work about
euthanasia, the killing of a person on his request. What is the
truth (unknown to judicature, pseudology and medicine alike) about
it? The patient may indeed request to stop his life, when it has
become unbearable in its suffering, but ... he is under the FALSE
impression that there is nothing else to do against this. Should he
know that it is wholly possible to be painless, without being pumped
full of poisons, but by mere talk, he certainly would not ask to be
killed, but HELPED from this pain. Physicists know nothing of pain,
as long as they do not realize that physical objects never suffer
it. Like all other life-typical subjects, pain too is ideational.
Since it is that, the obvious way to handle it is ideation, the
control of physics. Talk-anaesthesia is hundreds of years old. A
crack as e.g. Erickson showed it for terminal cancer patients. They
could sit up in bed without pain, as humans instead of insensitive
bags of protoplasm. Any discussion about euthanasia, MUST begin with
the known facts of life, so that the patients ask for adequate help,
instead of death by a help-ignorant physicist. Euthanasia, then,
becomes a meaningless term, no subject for discussion. Judges should
know this in order to force the doctors to study AND practise what
has been in the books for hundreds of years. These are the rights
and duties of man!
Next: Elaboration 13
Up: Elaborations
Previous: Elaboration 11
Ven
2007-09-11