next up previous
Next: Elaboration 15 Up: Elaboration 14 Previous: Elaboration 14.3


Elaboration 14.4

A still slightly altered approach is as follows. Let one, (the reader) try to define 'emotion'. It seems impossible without being circular, without putting emotion in, in some way (to like, want to, better, satisfaction, etc.), a sort of homoiomereia, putting small things in that what we want to explain and what is exactly these put in things. But when prolonged and earnest thinking defines 'meaning', lo ... we find 'emotion'. Emotion, from (Lat.) ex-movere, from 'to move out of-, because of, ... ', readily translates into 'being moved', and there is also the cause for moving, i.e. 'motive'. Hence, the same thing happens when we define 'purpose', we end up in motivation, in emotion. Superficially, nothing SEEMS more remote from 'meaning' than 'purpose', yet they both (according to Ordening-Theory), are virtually the same. All life is driven by-, based on-, gaining (to have) control, of power over the structure of REALITY. Was life identical with idea (ting), this also was identical with the 'I, to have' principle. Most basic, of course, is 'I, to have control', in many cases a sort of control, a power over reality that fills the belly, provides warmth, protection, etc. In man, control (purpose, meaning, emotion, etc.) has insignificantly to do with inanimate reality (physics) compared with the main-spring, i.e. control over others, control 'in socio', applause. Idea is synonymous with, a) know structure of Reality (emotion, meaning, have grasp of, etc. and b) change the (known) structure into a more desired one (purpose, meaning, motive etc.). The two are inseparably interwoven. When we speak of one (e.g. attitude, science, opinion, suggestion, honour, strategy, fault, pain, image, sympathy, pair, digit, analog, uneven, false, equilibrium, feed-back, aware, proximity, macho, authority, base, square-root, etc., etc.) we imply the other too. Idea knows ORDER, for changing ORDER, it changes order (law of Baudouin) because it realizes itself, the (known) order being not good enough. When we are not hungry (cold, etc.), we may try and invent a flying machine (physics), but always is our applause (control) in first place, prevalent, even just when we are inventing that machine. Parents, teachers, scientists, technicians, judges, philosophers, butchers, the man who clips your railway ticket, they all want control over mankind first (possession) (applause), their job in second or third place. The film star has a personality, has poise, is seemingly a top-ape instead of a mere nought, as she shows you. How does she do that? What is the observable difference between one who suggests (to you, the world) that she has 'a' personality, and one who does not suggest so (although may have one) ? Simply by showing to be in control. But how does one show to be in control? Simply, again, by showing 'contempt'. If possible, good-will (ing), plus contempt. Thus it is, that one gets idolated by people (suckers) for which one has-, and shows, the most utter contempt.
next up previous
Next: Elaboration 15 Up: Elaboration 14 Previous: Elaboration 14.3
Ven 2007-09-11