Next: Elaboration 30
Up: Elaborations
Previous: Elaboration 28.1
Elaboration 29
This looks like an attack on our contemporary prime ministers,
presidents, commissars, etc, yet it is not meant to be so. It is a
simple statement about a social scientific topic, a scientific
statement that can never be interpreted as an insult. Scientific
truth is independable of flattery or insult. Saying: 'You are an ass
(pig, rat, etc.) ' is an insult. Scientific truth says that you are
not, since you are a human. But declaring: 'You do speak untruth',
or, 'you speak of things unknown to you', 'you speak of things as
certainties that are unknowable for every human being', or again,
'you decide over people's fate without competence, your acquired
authority is illegal', etc., etc. may be interpreted as an insult,
but is in fact based upon pure facts, science. If it is insulting,
the facts are not so, but those who are producing these facts. It is
their own doing. Whether the diplomats will like it, or whether they
themselves can help it that they are doing a job for which they are
not qualified nor capable, has nothing to do with the adamant fact
'that' they are such. After all, everybody knows that killing and
torture goes on all the time on the globe, that large areas are
devastated and deforested, that a huge number of citizens are hungry
while others eat three times what they need, and throw for the pigs
half that amount, that there is a butter-mountain, a milk-lake, a
wine-pond, a beef-pile, vegetable oil-streams etc., that tulips are
grown in costly hothouses, on prime soil. They, the governing people
of today, are the only ones that 'can' govern so as to clean this
up, are therefore totally incapable persons. Except an Asoka, a
Pericles or other very long ago governors (when the problem was not
yet known, the solution very well known, e.g. to Socrates), there
has never been a proper prime-minister or president who was capable
to realize his job properly. This scientific statement can easily be
verified in reality. For the sake of decency, taking the dead ones
like Churchill and Roosevelt during World War 2. They tried to
create some order for the future chaos (that we are in), but did
they ever realise that they were representing a fundamentally
'illegal' government? When the answer is no ... they were not
capable to govern at all, when yes, did they ever act accordingly?
At least the second answer is sufficient to allow the scientific
statement of they being not capable, being in fact far worse than
every child that knows these things, knows that Earth is every
citizen's possession, that all governing should be done in the name
of all these citizens, otherwise 'is' illegal. The reader applies
the same test to whatever governor of today, he wishes to. The
outcome remains the same. Totally unqualified and incapable, illegal
persons, doing an illegal job of governing only 'part' of earth,
part of its citizens, 'a' nation. Is not your heart getting chilly
when you hear the president of the most powerful nation speak of
Christian principles and democratic ways? Superstition as the rule,
and democrazy!
Next: Elaboration 30
Up: Elaborations
Previous: Elaboration 28.1
Ven
2007-09-11