"Julian Huxley also wrote something that indicated his absolute lack of insight in matters of Man."
"I am curious about that Master."
"He said ('On Living in a Revolution'): 'What is more, the failure of the League of Nations merely served to underline the urgent need for some international political organisation."
"I see Master. It is bad science. When the international political organisations like the League failed (they could have predicted that from all history, onwards from Herodotus), a proper scientist would infer that there is NOT a need, again, for such a thing. He would conclude that, in contrast, there was a need for a NON-international, i.e. an INTEGRATIONAL-, therefore, NON-political government. Had the scientists grasped that in the days Huxley wrote it (1942) they could have predicted that the United Nations would also fail, as indeed, it still does."
"Yes, besides the scientists would have advocated an integrated D-day (1944) to begin with, saving thousands of lives." [232] It is seldom relised that with a World-Government, Lottocratically qua structure, all politics stop on the spot. So does diplomacy.